The Widget Effect was published in 2009 and it described the state of teacher evaluation. It identified that, using the evaluation systems used in the United States at that time, all teachers were satisfactory (less than 1% were rated unsatisfactory). The report also concluded that truly excellent teaching went unrecognized, that professional development was not connected to evaluations, and that poor performance was not addressed. Despite the overwhelmingly positive rating that teachers were receiving, 57% of teachers and 81% of administrators reported that there were poor teachers in their school. These findings pointed, we were told, toward the need for a new system of teacher evaluation. Results similar to the findings of the report were published for New York and discussed in Continue reading
At their June meeting, the Board of Regents approved another change to the §3012-d APPR regulations. This time, they expanded conditions for a waiver to the independent evaluator requirement.
Since the fall, a waiver has been available to smaller, more rural districts who could meet certain size of number of building requirements. The waiver had no impact on the required number of minimum observations, it just waived the requirement that an independent observer (someone from a different BEDS code) had to do an observation in addition to the observations that the Lead Evaluator conducted. Continue reading
Beginning in the spring of 2017, NYSED will create committees comprised of stakeholders, practitioners, and experts in the field to provide recommendations on assessments and evaluations that could be used for evaluations in the future. Committees organized by topic area will review all important components currently and potentially in teacher/principal evaluations including the current landscape of options being employed nationally as well as review the existing structure of the NYS evaluation system. A proposal for an evaluation system will be brought to the Board in the spring of 2018 for 2019-2020 implementation.
If we could create a system for teacher and leader evaluation from scratch, what would it include? The Aspen Institute presented a whitepaper to the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) with their recommendations: Continue reading
Note: This is a revised and updated version of a previous post. The gist of the article remains the same. Information about standards revisions and transitions has been updated.
The Common Core State Learning Standards are standards. Not curriculum. Not tests. Not evaluation. Standards.
Standards are the “to do” list for learning. They are a list of the things we want students to know, understand, be able to do, and be like. In 1996, New York State issued a complete set of standards for all subject areas and grade levels. There were twenty-three sets of standards that were organized into seven bundles. For example, math, science, and technology were grouped together in a bundle of seven standards (and the accompanying detail). Similarly, Health, Physical Education and Family and Consumer Science were bundled together. Continue reading
The Board of Regents just confirmed the “transition” amendments to the Annual professional Performance Review (APPR) System.
What does this mean? Most of all, it is important to note that all districts must still complete their APPR plan as approved, whether a §3012-c or §3012-d plan. The emergency changes to the APPR regulations mean that for some people (those connected to 3-8 state assessments and state-provided growth scores) districts will also provide a transition score. Continue reading
Once again, New York can learn from Ontario. As has been previously described, Ontario has taken a dramatically different approach toward educational reform than New York. The approach to reform has been dramatically different, as have been the results. Ontario is an international success story and is recognized to be the best school system in the English-speaking world (Fullan, 2013). Fullan also reported that public satisfaction with education in the province of Ontario is at an all-time high. New York, on the other hand, is in the midst of a political drama that it hasn’t seen in quite some time (if ever). This doesn’t benefit the children of New York, so anything that we can do to improve the situation is vital. Perhaps we can learn from Ontario and this example. Continue reading
The previous APPR system was indefensible. And, as we are learning, the present APPR system is indefensible, too. To create another system that is a revision of the present system and expect different results is where the insanity enters. Yet, the proposals that are on the budget table will only serve to perpetuate a flawed system while re-elevating the level of drama. Indeed, the din between the warring parties is exacerbating the insanity.
Although the changes he wants are all the wrong changes, at least Continue reading